10 Misunderstandings about Magnetic Particle Testing


This article discusses the most common incorrect assumptions about magnetic particle inspection and gives you some solutions to combat these misunderstandings  

by Richard Ridenour, National Sales Manager & Level III, and Wyatt Burns, Innovation Specialist 

Magnaflux co-founders, Alfred V. de Forest and Foster B. Doane, developed the magnetic testing method in the early 1930’s and it has been a core method of nondestructive testing ever since. However, even after being used by generations of NDT professionals, there are still some common areas of confusion or misunderstanding. 

Here we set the record straight on 10 misperceptions we’ve seen in the field in recent years. 


1. All metals can be used in Magnetic Particle Testing 

What is the composition of your parts? It is important to understand what metals your parts are made of because only iron, nickel and cobalt can be magnetized. Most of their alloys and some forms of steels are also magnetic. 

Aluminum is being used for an estimated 80% of aircraft materials today, because it is lightweight, strong, predictable and inexpensive. It is also one of the most common metals tested with magnetic particle inspection that cannot be magnetized.  

If you are ever in doubt of the what can and cannot be magnetized, grab a permanent magnet and see if it sticks! 


2. Your bath doesn’t need to be changed  

Contamination is in every environment no matter how clean your space and parts are. Oils, greases, sand, dirt and other solids will be introduced to your bath by inspected components.  

Oil in a water bath and vice versa is a primary concern as well. These unwanted contaminants can hinder testing performance and disguise indications. 

Examine the carrier and particles during daily bath concentration checks. By looking for differences in color, layering or banding in either the carrier or the particles, you can spot contamination. If there is a band that fluoresces brighter than the bulk of the material, than there are excessive unattached fluorescent pigments and the bath should be changed.  

The bath should be changed when foreign matter exceeds 30% of settled solids. 

Dirt contamination

Water contamination

Dust contamination

Good Bath Example


3. More current is always better  

Sending more current through a part is not always better 

If you hit a part with more amps you are less likely to see indications. This is because the fluorescent particles will not only be attracted to the flux leakages (indications), but to the entire part. This will create a bright background that hides the indications operators are looking for. 

You do not want to saturate your field and mask defects because you need sharp contrast with the background of the part to easily spot indications.  

It is important to work with a MT Level 3 to develop correct test methods that are part specific. 

Parts with too much amperage used to magnetize them 


4. All materials magnetize the same way 

If parts look the same, but are made of different material, they will not use the same test method settings. This is because varied materials have different permeability and retentivity. 

Permeability affects how easily magnetic current travels through the part and gets attracted to small flux leakages because of flaws. Retentivity of a material affects how well the material hold its magnetic field. 

To ensure that parts are properly tested, double check the material and do not assume the same techniques can be used on similar looking parts. 


5. Part cleaning is not necessary 

Pre-testing part cleaning is a key part of the process to ensure the highest probability of detection. If you clean the part properly, it will decrease contamination to your bath and increase visibility of indications on the part itself. 

Use a cleaner or remover to prepare parts before sending them to the magnetic particle testing area. Not only will this improve the quality of your inspections, but it can reduce the amount of times you need to change your bath. 


6. You can mag through coatings 

According to ASTM E709-15, “Thin nonconductive coatings, such as paint in the order of 1 or 2 mil (0.02 to 0.05 mm) will not normally interfere with the formation of indications, but they must be removed at all points where electrical contact is to be made for direct magnetization. 

Conduction coatings can mask discontinuities as well, and it must be demonstrated that the unacceptable discontinuities can be detected through the coating.  


7. You must always do two shots  

When looking for cracks in both the longitudinal and latitudinal direction, most machines require two shots. This is because the magnetic field that each shot produces will affect the other, which erases indications in one of the directions. There are two ways around firing two shots and inspecting a part twice.  

The first is to only look for cracks in one direction. This is a testing specification decided by a certified level three, which depending on the part geometry and intended application.  

The second way to avoid firing to shots is with a multi-directional mag bench. These benches have multiple phase circuitry that allow both directions of magnetic field to be applied at the same time without affecting each other. 

If you care about high throughput and need both directions inspected for cracks then a multi-directional wet bench is the best option. It gets the job done in one shot and with one UV lamp inspection rather than two. 


8. Daily system performance checks are not crucial 

There is a reason that ASTM and NADCAP require quality checks to be performed and recorded.  

Performing daily checks are crucial to ensure your bath and machine are in proper working condition. Operators must check specific criteria like bath concentration and UV lamp intensity daily or every shift. There are many more quality checks, like ambient white light, that can play a large factor in the inspector’s ability to see indications. 

The daily checks can save time and money in the long run. There have been instances that an entire days’ worth of parts must be retested because the machine was not correctly calibrated and nothing got magnetized. 


9. Adding particles makes it easier to detect indications 

More particles are not better.  

Adding too many particles to a bath will add too much concentration, and you will lose the ability to see small defects because of the excess background. 

It is better to replace the entire bath and slowly add particles until the correct concentration is met. 


10. Multi-directional units are always better 

If you are only testing a few parts, it may not be worth the time to calibrate the machine for a multi-directional shot since an MD unit will only cut your time in half if you are processing parts in high volume using the same test method.  

For complex parts in small volumes, it is better to go to a standard mag particle inspection unit and perform two mag shots. 


What other common misunderstandings or mistakes have you seen?  
Share your knowledge in the comments section below. 

Subscribe to Magnaflux News:

Want to stay up on the latest NDT insights and articles from Magnaflux? 

Subscribe to Magnaflux updates above to get fresh news delivered to your inbox once a week.

Please wait while we gather your results.

Related Blog Entries

A Primer on Magnetic Particle Inspection

A Primer on Magnetic Particle Inspection [SlideShare]

A 4-minute mag particle primer to help you understand why this simple, quick, and effective method is still widely used today.


The most common incorrect assumptions about magnetic particle inspection

10 Misunderstandings about Magnetic Particle Testing

This article discusses the most common incorrect assumptions about magnetic particle inspection and gives you some solutions to combat these misunderstandings


Why carrier oil is a critical part of the MPI process

Importance of Using the Correct Oil for Magnetic Particle Inspection

In this article, we explain why carrier oil is a critical part of the MPI process and which characteristics to look for when choosing an NDT carrier fluid


Carrier II SlideShare

Understanding Wet Method Magnetic Particle Testing Carrier II [SlideShare]

Learn about Magnaflux's NDT-approved petroleum base suspension vehicle for Wet Method Magnetic Particle Testing, and how it compares to competitors.


Technique Management Challenges

How Integrated Techniques Can Ease the Pain of Part Variability

This article explores issues many magnetic particle inspection operators face when testing diverse parts that require specific standards and acceptance criteria in a world that does not accept mistakes


Magnaflux Semi-automated System

Magnetic Particle Equipment for OCTG Couplings [Video]

See how Magnaflux's semi-automated magnetic particle testing system simplifies Oil Country Tubular Good coupling inspection.


Magnaflux Database System for NDT Control

Database System for Mag Particle Wet Benches [Video]

Learn how this process-control and efficiency upgrade for mag particle testing helps NDT pros improve quality with less time.


Magnetic Particle Crack Comparison

How Brightness and Contrast Impact NDT Inspections

How perception and vision can have a significant impact on probability of detection in non-destructive testing inspections.


Mobile Power Packs Demo

Adaptable Mobile Power Packs for Magnetic Particle Inspection [Video]

Learn how to use M-Series magnetizing equipment to perform Magnetic Particle Inspections on a variety of large, heavy parts.


NDT Carrier Oil Fluid for Mag Particle Testing

Frequently Asked Questions About NDT Carrier Fluid

In this article, we explain what an NDT-approved carrier is and what sets it apart from commonly used, non-approved base oils


Mag Particle Settling Volume Test

Mag Particle Carrier Settling Test Performance [Video]

See how three common magnetic particle testing carriers perform in a standard ASTM E1444 settling volume test.


Aerospace MRO NDT

Reducing Particle Loss During Mag Particle Testing [Case Study]

In this case study, we help an aerospace MRO customer resolve fluctuations in their magnetic particle concentration


Magnetic Particle Inspection Demo

5 Quick Tips for Mag Particle Testing [Infographic]

Some handy tips for beginners who are new to magnetic particle testing or NDT pros who want an easy reference guide.


Magnetic Particle Equipment Demo

Multi-directional Mag Particle Inspection Equipment [Video]

Watch the versatile MD-Series multi-directional mag particle inspection equipment in action. Learn how this wet bench can help you save time and money.


Magnetic Particle Inspection Demo

How to Do Visible Magnetic Particle Inspections [Video]

See an overview of visible, dry-method magnetic particle inspection method according to ASTM E1444.


Magnetic Particle Inspection Demo

How to Do Fluorescent Mag Particle Inspections [Video]

Watch a demonstration of the magnetic particle inspection method according to ASTM E1444 with basic steps for NDT using fluorescent magnetic particles.


How to Do Preventative Maintenance for Magnetic Particle Equipment

Read how regular upkeep on mag particle equipment is critical for non-destructive testing to safe guard inspections & reduce downtime.


Multidirectional Magnetization for Magnetic Particle Inspection

Learn about multi-directional magnetization applications and how mag particle inspections can benefit from multi-vector magnetization.


The following required items were not provided or are in the wrong format. Please provide the required responses and submit again:

  Please enter your name
  Please enter a valid email
Comment Title
Comment: 250 characters left
  Please enter a comment

Subscribe to Magnaflux News:


155 Harlem Avenue
Glenview, IL 60025, USA
Telephone: +1 847-657-5300
Fax: +1 847-657-5388
Contact Magnaflux Customer Service

Select Your Country North America Mexico Brazil China Europe Russia India New Zealand, Australia, Japan, Southeast Asia
© 2016 Magnaflux - all rights reserved.