Understanding Type-, Batch- and In-Use-Testing for Liquid Penetrants [Case Study]

  •  

In this case study, we help a manufacturing customer understand the differences between three types of testing for liquid penetrants

October 3, 2017

Penetrant Type Testing

 

The Customer

Our customer is a global manufacturing company that specializes in the inspection of components for the aerospace and defense sectors. Their work requires the use of high sensitivity penetrants in compliance with the specification requirements outlined in AMS 2644.

 

The Challenge

Our customer received a request for two requirements from their downstream customer:

  • Physicochemical parameters: immersion penetrant must be checked at least quarterly in accordance with AMS 2644 (acceptance tests).
     
  • For re-used penetrant and re-used emulsifier (when performed by immersion), it must be checked at least annually to make sure the physical properties are still in accordance with AMS 2644 sub-chapter 3.3.

 

Our customer was familiar with in-use testing of penetrants and were confused by this request since they did not feel that:

  • The acceptance tests should fall into their remit.
     
  • AMS 2644 Section 3.3 applied to them.

 

The Solution

The key point is to understand the differences between type testing, batch testing and in-use testing:
 

Type Testing

When seeking approval for a penetrant in accordance with material specifications such as AMS 2644 and EN ISO 3452-2, the penetrant manufacturer is responsible for getting the product type-tested. This involves sending a sample of the penetrant off to an independent laboratory for verification against a comprehensive set of standard tests. These tests are referred to as the ‘qualification tests’.
 

Batch Testing

During the routine manufacture of a penetrant and its associated consumable products, it is a requirement under material specifications such as AMS 2644 and EN ISO 3452-2 for the manufacturer to carry out several batch-specific tests.

These specifications also specify the sampling rate and dictate that results should be published on a certificate of conformance. These tests are referred to as the ‘acceptance tests’. Under AMS 2644, the acceptance tests are as follows (see table below):

Product Type Test AMS 2644 Reference
Penetrant Flash point 3.3.3
Viscosity 3.3.4
Fluorescent brightness (Type 1 systems only) 3.3.8.3.2
Water tolerance (Method A only) 3.3.8.5
Removeability 3.3.8.6
Emulsifier Flash point 3.3.3
Viscosity 3.3.4
Water content (Method D only) 3.3.9.6
Developer Developer fluorescence 3.3.10.2
Developer removability 3.3.10.4
Redispersibility (Forms c, d and e only) 3.3.10.5


In-Use Testing

There is no reference for in-use tests within the AMS or EN-ISO standards. When a penetrant is used by a company carrying out inspection, they need to carry out a set of in-use tests. ASTM E1417 established standards for performance checks for in-use materials (see table below).

You can find more information on these tests here. You will also find details about our PeneCert™ testing service, where in-use tests are carried out using an independent laboratory.

In-Use Test Frequency
System performance Daily
Penetrant contamination Daily
Developer contamination (soluble and suspendable) Daily
Developer concentration (soluble and suspendable) Weekly
Developer condition – dry powder Daily
Water content (water washable only) Monthly
Emulsifier concentration (hydrophilic Only) Weekly
Penetrant sensitivity As required by 7.8.3
Fluorescent brightness – measured brightness Quarterly
Emulsifier water content (lipophilic only) Monthly
Penetrant removability (water washable only) As required per 7.8.3
Emulsifier removability (lipophilic and hydrophilic) As required per 7.8.3

 

The Results

The above information was relayed to the downstream customer, clarifying where testing responsibilities lie. Magnaflux is always willing to help our customers answer important questions such as this one.

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST TO RECEIVE THE LATEST NDT INSIGHTS AND ARTICLES FROM MAGNAFLUX

Want to stay up on the latest NDT insights and articles from Magnaflux? 

Subscribe to Magnaflux updates above to get fresh news delivered to your inbox once a week.

Please wait while we gather your results.

Related Blog Entries

Visible Liquid Penetrant Inspection

Better Weld Inspections with Dye Penetrant [Case Study]

Learn how one engineering and fab company improved their NDT weld inspection quality with SKL-WP2 dye penetrant.

Read More...

Why Penetrant Removability is Important, Not Just Sensitivity

Why Penetrant Removability is Important, Not Just Sensitivity

High quality fluorescent liquid penetrant inspections require strong removability combined with strong sensitivity to deliver clear, crisp indications

Read More...

Differences of Using Multi-Directional and Uni-Directional

Differences of Using Multi-Directional and Uni-Directional

In this experiment, we compare the speed of a multi-directional magnetic particle wet bench to a traditional uni-directional method.

Read More...

Benefits of Developer

Benefits of Using Developer During Liquid Penetrant Inspection [Case Study]

Learn how a automotive manufacturer increased indication detection in visible and UV light with developer.

Read More...

Magnaflux Penetrant Inspection

Higher Sensitivity Penetrant Improves Inspection Quality [Case Study]

In this case study, we help an aerospace customer improve inspection quality and consistency with two Magnaflux penetrants

Read More...

Airplane Engine NDT

How to Improve Fluorescent NDT Process Control with LED UV Lighting [Case Study]

See how an aerospace OEM manufacturer increased NDT inspection reliability & control with wide-beam, overhead LED UV-A lamps

Read More...

ST700 High Volume Inspections

How to Increase High-Volume NDT Inspection Speed and Reliability with LED UV Lighting [Case Study]

See how an automotive parts manufacturer decreased inspection time and improved reliability with wide-beam, overhead UV lamps

Read More...

Protective Armor Inspection with Zyglo Penetrant [Case Study]

Protective Armor Inspection with Zyglo Penetrant [Case Study]

In this case study, we show how an armor solutions provider increased quality control on a semi-porous surface with ZL-19

Read More...

Aerospace MRO NDT

Reducing Particle Loss During Mag Particle Testing [Case Study]

In this case study, we help an aerospace MRO customer resolve fluctuations in their magnetic particle concentration

Read More...

Magnaflux Penetrant Inspection

Understanding Type-, Batch- and In-Use-Testing for Liquid Penetrants [Case Study]

Learn the differences between type testing, batch testing and in-use testing for NDT liquid penetrants.

Read More...

Use of Solvent Based Developer for 3D Scanning [Case Study]

Use of Solvent Based Developer for 3D Scanning [Case Study]

Learn about a customer who was in search of an aerosol with an even matte coating, fast drying properties, and easy is to remove

Read More...

Liquid penetrants for leak detection of ventilation systems

Using Fluorescent Penetrant for Ventilation System Leak Detention [Case Study]

Learn how to look at the recommended actions associated with the chemical risk assessment.

Read More...

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST TO RECEIVE THE LATEST NDT INSIGHTS AND ARTICLES FROM MAGNAFLUX

Magnaflux

155 Harlem Avenue
Glenview, IL 60025, USA
Telephone: +1 847-657-5300
Contact Magnaflux Customer Service

Select Your Country North America Mexico Brazil China Europe India New Zealand, Australia, Japan, Southeast Asia
© 2024 Magnaflux - All Rights Reserved.
top