AMS 2644 Revision G: Key Changes and Updates

  •  

On April 8, 2019 AMS 2644G1 was published, replacing the 2013 revision F. This revision was completed as part of a standard review cycle, and to address changes in the industry and shortcomings of the previous revision.   

 By Shawn Kilty, Division R&D Manager 

Water-Based Penetrants Get Their Own Classification: Method A(W) 

One significant change in Revision G is the inclusion of a new class of penetrants, Method A(W). Method A(W) was created to distinguish between Method A penetrants that are water-based, and those that are oil or surfactant based. Previously, all Method A materials were lumped together, regardless of their chemical composition. This change was made to address the increased interest in the market for products that are water-based. Method A(W) penetrants are being defined as products that contain 20% or more water.   

Additional changes were made to support the addition of Method A(W) to the specification, including: 

  1. Addition of a flashpoint method that is compatible with aqueous materials. 
  2. A require maximum water content limit of 5% for Method A, B, C, and D penetrants. 

 

Updates to the Method A Penetrant Qualification Criteria 

The next big update in Revision G is a significant change to the qualification criteria for Method A penetrants. Since its inception in 1996, the qualification criteria for AMS 2644 have undergone several changes as the lab at Wright-Patterson AFB improved the techniques used to test and approve penetrants. Although the qualification criteria changed, previously approved products were never required to be retested. This practice led to a situation where at least some of the penetrants listed on the Qualified Products List (QPL) would not meet the most current qualification criteria. 

To address this, penetrant manufacturers were required to submit samples of all Method A penetrants to WPAFB. These penetrants were tested for sensitivity and removability, and new standards were designated to establish the minimum sensitivity and removability requirements for each sensitivity level. Method A(W) penetrants were also tested as part of this process, and they will be held to the same standards as the Method A materials.           

  

Manufacturing Facility Consistency 

Another significant update to revision G is a requirement for penetrant manufacturers to provide data demonstrating that their products are consistent between their manufacturing facilities. Only one sample from a single facility undergoes testing during the qualification process, causing a concern that individual products may vary significantly from one facility to another. To address this, supporting data should include material scans using either Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) or Mass Spectroscopy (MS). The new requirement helps ensure manufacturers are providing products that are consistent across all manufacturing sites. 

  

Planned changes for Revision H 

Work has already begun to collect data for the next revision of AMS 2644. The plan is to have updated qualification criteria for Method B systems included in this revision. This update will be similar to the update to the Method A qualification criteria discussed above. WPAFB requested that manufacturers submit samples of all Method B materials by mid-March, 2019. No timetable is set for completion of this testing. 

 

Understand fluorescent liquid penetrant sensitivity levels and how to find the right one for your application with this Guide to AMS 2644 Penetrant Sensitivity Levels article. 

 

Published May 21, 2019 

Please wait while we gather your results.

Related Blog Posts

Magnaflux Dye Penetrant Testing

How to Do Visible Dye Penetrant Testing

Watch an overview of the dye penetrant testing method according to ASTM E1417, including basic steps for NDT with an AMS 2644 Type 2 penetrant.

Read More...

Magnaflux Water Washable Penetrant

Water Washable versus Post Emulsifiable Penetrant – Which is Right for You?

Learn the differences between water-removable and non-water-washable liquid penetrant to figure out which is right for you

Read More...

Leak-Detection-Penetrant-Testing

Leak Detection with Penetrant Testing Process

Read more about using penetrant testing products to inspect for leaks by using fluorescent or visible/colored penetrant to enhance visual detection of leaks.

Read More...

Differences between Level 2 penetrants

How to Select a Level 2 Fluorescent Penetrant

5-question guide to help understand the differences between Level 2 penetrants.

Read More...

What You Need to Start-up In-house Testing [Checklist]

What You Need to Start-up In-house Testing [Checklist]

Step-by-step process listing everything from the equipment needed in magnetic particle testing and liquid penetrant testing to preparation for NDT audits

Read More...

What is Method A(W)?

What is Method A(W)?

Learn about the separate category for Method A penetrants according to AMS 2644 and what they contain in their formula.

Read More...

Contaminated Powder Developer

9 Daily Performance Checks for Liquid Penetrant Inspection Systems

Learn more on why penetrant daily checks are important for the integrity of your LPI Systems

Read More...

4 Level III Daily Responsibilities

4 Level III Daily Responsibilities

Defining the different types of Level IIIs and some aspects of what their job entails

Read More...

Understanding Safety Data Sheets

Understanding Safety Data Sheets: Do You Know What’s in the Chemicals You Handle?

We highlight the 5 major sections to understand on a Safety Data Sheets (SDS) in accordance with US OHSHA Hazcom 2012 GHS regulations

Read More...

Liquid Penetrant in Dip Tank

How to Maintain Penetrant Testing System Performance

Learn how liquid penetrant testing products lose performance over time and what to do to ensure penetrant test reliability.

Read More...

Understanding the Magnaflux Shelf Life Statement for NDT Chemicals

Understanding the Magnaflux Shelf Life Statement for NDT Chemicals

Answering popular questions regarding shelf life for magnetic particle and liquid penetrant products used in nondestructive testing

Read More...

Magnetic Particle Crack Comparison

How Brightness and Contrast Impact NDT Inspections

How perception and vision can have a significant impact on probability of detection in non-destructive testing inspections.

Read More...

Dye Penetrant Testing on Pipe

How Low Temperatures Impact Dye Penetrant Testing

Learn how lower inspection temperatures affect the performance of dye penetrant testing cleaners, penetrant and developers

Read More...

Why Penetrant Removability is Important, Not Just Sensitivity

Why Penetrant Removability is Important, Not Just Sensitivity

High quality fluorescent liquid penetrant inspections require strong removability combined with strong sensitivity to deliver clear, crisp indications

Read More...

Use of Method D Hydrophilic Emulsifier

Use of Method D Hydrophilic Emulsifier

Learn about the Method D liquid penetrant inspection nondestructive testing method

Read More...

Visible Liquid Penetrant Inspection

Better Weld Inspections with Dye Penetrant [Case Study]

Learn how one engineering and fab company improved their NDT weld inspection quality with SKL-WP2 dye penetrant.

Read More...

In this blog we explore the various forms of developer and learn what makes them different

What are the Differences Between Developers, and Which Should I Use For Penetrant Inspections?

Developers enhance the visibility of penetrant indications, in this blog we explore the various forms and learn what makes them different.

Read More...

ASTM E1417: Key Changes and Updates

ASTM E1417: Key Changes and Updates

The next revision of ASTM E1417 has been published, and a lot is changing. Here are several changes that you should be aware of.

Read More...

Magnaflux Penetrant Testing

Exposing 10 Common Misunderstandings about Penetrant Testing

We reveal common misperceptions about liquid penetrant inspection we’ve seen in the field in recent years

Read More...

AMS 2644 Penetrant Sensitivity Levels

A Guide to AMS 2644 Penetrant Sensitivity Levels

Understand fluorescent liquid penetrant sensitivity levels and how to find the right one for your application

Read More...

The Ultimate Guide to Visible Dye Penetrant Testing [Video]

The Ultimate Guide to Visible Dye Penetrant Testing

Some handy tips for beginners who are new to visible dye penetrant testing or NDT pros who want an easy reference guide.

Read More...

Penetrant Testing Demo

How to Do Fluorescent Liquid Penetrant Testing

Watch a demonstration of the penetrant inspection method according to ASTM E1417, including basic steps for NDT with an AMS 2644 Type 1 penetrant.

Read More...

Benefits of Developer

Benefits of Using Developer During Liquid Penetrant Inspection [Case Study]

Learn how a automotive manufacturer increased indication detection in visible and UV light with developer.

Read More...

The Ultimate Guide to Fluorescent Penetrant Testing [Infographic]

The Ultimate Guide to Fluorescent Penetrant Testing [Infographic]

Liquid penetrant inspection is a nondestructive test method which does not harm the parts being inspected.

Read More...

This technical paper shows examples of how Magnaflux can customize liquid penetrant equipment to me

Liquid Penetrant Equipment – Customized Solutions for Unique Needs

This technical paper shows examples of how Magnaflux can customize liquid penetrant equipment to meet part size and floor space requirements

Read More...

Liquid Penetrant Aerosol Coverage Test

NDT Visible Liquid Penetrant Aerosol Coverage Test

See how three popular visible liquid penetrants perform in a coverage test to learn how many square feet each can covered

Read More...

5 Things to Consider When Choosing a Mag Particle Yoke [Checklist]

4 Habits of NDT Aerosol Safe Handling

Safety is a make-or-break factor in a technician's world – we list details around hazards, storage, recycling, and shipping of NDT aerosols

Read More...

AMS 2644 Revision G: Key Changes and Updates

AMS 2644 Revision G: Key Changes and Updates

On April 8, 2019 AMS 2644G1 was published, replacing the 2013 revision F. This revision was completed as part of a standard review cycle, and to address changes in the industry and shortcomings of the previous revision.

Read More...

Learn about the available properties of developers

Does Developer Dry Time Impact Indication Strength?

Learn about the available properties of developers and the relationship between dwell time and inspection quality

Read More...

Magnaflux Penetrant Inspection

Higher Sensitivity Penetrant Improves Inspection Quality [Case Study]

In this case study, we help an aerospace customer improve inspection quality and consistency with two Magnaflux penetrants

Read More...

How Water Content Effects Viscosity of Fluorescent Penetrant

How Water Content Affects Viscosity of Fluorescent Penetrant [Case Study]

We show how a customer worked with the quality experts at Magnaflux to analyze data trends in the fluorescent penetrant to stay compliant

Read More...

More Than Just Test Results, PeneCert™ Test Services is a Partnership

More Than Just Test Results, PeneCert™ Test Services is a Partnership

Liquid penetrant testing services help verify that your systems are compliant and act as a partner in your NDT process

Read More...

Overview of Liquid Penetrant Inspection and Magnetic Particle Inspection Specifications

Overview of Liquid Penetrant Inspection and Magnetic Particle Inspection Specifications

Understanding ASTM and SAE/AMS specifications to select the corresponding Magnaflux product for Liquid Penetrant and Magnetic Particle Inspections

Read More...

Protective Armor Inspection with Zyglo Penetrant [Case Study]

Protective Armor Inspection with Zyglo Penetrant [Case Study]

In this case study, we show how an armor solutions provider increased quality control on a semi-porous surface with ZL-19

Read More...

Three steps to narrow down a penetrant method

Selecting A Dye Penetrant Method [Checklist]

Three steps to narrow down a penetrant method through governing specifications, part composition, and test parts

Read More...

NADCAP and Known Defect Standards

Understanding Nadcap System Performance Check and Known Defect Standards

Properly demonstrating the system performance check was the #2 Nadcap audit finding for penetrant systems. What do you need to do to comply?

Read More...

PeneCert Test Services

Understanding PeneCert Test Services [SlideShare]

Learn more about test services for in-use penetrant, emulsifiers and developers to comply with ASMT E1417 and AMS 2644.

Read More...

Magnaflux Penetrant Inspection

Understanding Type-, Batch- and In-Use-Testing for Liquid Penetrants [Case Study]

Learn the differences between type testing, batch testing and in-use testing for NDT liquid penetrants.

Read More...

Use of Solvent Based Developer for 3D Scanning [Case Study]

Use of Solvent Based Developer for 3D Scanning [Case Study]

Learn about a customer who was in search of an aerosol with an even matte coating, fast drying properties, and easy is to remove

Read More...

Liquid penetrants for leak detection of ventilation systems

Using Fluorescent Penetrant for Ventilation System Leak Detention [Case Study]

Learn how to look at the recommended actions associated with the chemical risk assessment.

Read More...

What Do I Do If My Penetrant Freezes!?

What Do I Do If My Penetrant Freezes!?

Discover what mixing or testing could be required to return a penetrant to its original state once it has frozen

Read More...

What Value Does ISO 9001 Add?

What Value Does ISO 9001 Add?

Learn how ISO 9001 affects the NDT materials you use, therefore affecting your quality management system

Read More...

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST TO RECEIVE THE LATEST NDT INSIGHTS AND ARTICLES FROM MAGNAFLUX

Magnaflux

155 Harlem Avenue
Glenview, IL 60025, USA
Telephone: +1 847-657-5300
Contact Magnaflux Customer Service

Select Your Country North America Mexico Brazil China Europe India New Zealand, Australia, Japan, Southeast Asia
© 2024 Magnaflux - All Rights Reserved.
top